willhart.io ALL POSTS ALL TAGS

First impressions: converting a React/Firebase project to GraphQL

Posted by Will Hart on 2018-10-27

I've been working on a project on and off for about 2 years, which I'm using to create basketball play diagrams. I wanted some real-time features and eventually settled on firebase for the backend. I found react-redux-firebase, a fantastic project for redux / firebase bindings, and quickly built up a prototype. I used the app throughout the entire 2017/18 basketball season and found it very useful for scouting reports, building up training plans and so on.

GraphiQL, a handy tool for browsing and interacting with a GraphQL server

Then development stalled... the constraints of firebase, the weight of redux boilerplate and the few idiosyncrasies of the firebase bindings made adding new features a bit of a drag. The project was usable, but it had enough app-crashing bugs that I wasn't comfortable sharing it with other coaches.

The "play editor", showing how basketball plays can be edited using the web interface.

What wasn't right about firestore?

Actually, not a whole lot, if I'm honest. Firebase has a very decent free tier, is easy to get up and running, and has nice built-in support for features like authentication. I did have a few small frustrations:

  1. The security rules that are used for authorisation depend on a custom language which is a bit of a nightmare to develop and especially debug. firebase-bolt is an improvement over the normal security rule language, but not very well maintained. (in the end with the firestore beta I gave up on security rules for the MVP).
  2. Even some seemingly simple tasks like preventing new user sign ups were also surprisingly hard to do.
  3. I found normalisation of data structures well-suited to the redux architecture, but also a pain to work with for multi-layered hierarchical documents as it felt like it required a lot of additional queries.
  4. The bindings were pre 1.0 so there were a few weird bugs like this one which gave me headaches, and were tricky to debug.
  5. redux boilerplate :(

Discovering GraphQL

Coming back to the project after a few months away, I felt like it was time for a change. While (for now) this is just a hobby project, I wanted to open it up to a few of my fellow coaches. As some of the issues in the project would require me to restructure the database, and I felt like the GUI needed a complete overhaul, I decided to look around for some other options to firebase.

I'd been hearing good things about GraphQL so kind of as a "what if..." I decided to learn GraphQL while porting the firebase project over.

Initially I settled on a stack of next.js and react-apollo on the client (neither of which I had used before), although after a couple of days wrestling with SSR and file system routing of next (and getting annoyed that half their tutorials are behind a login wall), I ditched next in favour of the old faithful, create-react-app.

For the MVP server I chose prisma and graphql-yoga. So far I've migrated about 80% of the functionality from the firestore website to the react-apollo website, and I'm very happy with the approach. I've listed some of the "pros and cons" I've encountered with GraphQL so far below.

What I like about GraphQL

Easy(ish) to learn

I knew absolutely nothing about GraphQL, and initially it looked a little intimidating, so I did what any self-respecting developer does when they are lost - I googled. I found How to GraphQL, which is a really well laid out tutorial showing you how to create a GraphQL server and client. It only took a day or so of tinkering before it clicked into place, and I could start transitioning my firebase app over.

Writing queries / mutations is very easy

In the front end writing type safe queries is as simple as this:

query GET_PLAYS($userId: ID!) {
  getPlays(userId: $userId) {

The server requires a bit more code, having the query defined a second time in a schema.graphql, and a resolver function which converts the query into a response to the client. A simple resolver in prisma might look something like:

export const getPlays = async (root, data, context) => {
  return await context.prisma.user({ id: data.userId }).plays()

Resolvers tend to only do one thing, and are only a few lines long, making them easy to develop.

Declarative data / reduced prop-passing in the client

In the client with react-apollo, data is queried or changed by wrapping the React elements in higher order components. A Query HOC is used to fetch data and a Mutation HOC can be used to modify or create data. Both use render props to handle the results of their operation. An (over simplified) example of how a Query would be used is like:

// e.g. import { GET_PLAYS } from '../client-schema/get-plays.graphql'

<Query query={GET_PLAYS}>
  {result => result.getPlays.map(item => <Play {...item />)}

This runs when the component loads, and then allows mapping the returned query data over components. react-apollo also provides cache implementations so you can optionally display data from local-storage etc while the query is being returned from the server.

A mutation is also quite simple:

<Mutation mutation={UPDATE_NAME} variables={{ name: this.state.newName }}>
  {(mutation) => <button onClick={mutation}>Update Name</button>}

Here the component passes the "mutation" function to its render props which actually performs the update on the server. You don't need to "marshal" the arguments in a separate callback, this is done for you by the HOC. (If necessary you have the option to call the mutation directly like a function)

An advantage of this declarative approach is that I find myself doing a lot less "prop passing" through the hierarchy. Instead I just define the data requirements at the point where they are used. This also results in less digging through files trying to work out where the onPlayCreated prop originally came from.

Ditching redux

While I've built a few applications using redux and I'm a fan of the flux approach, I do find myself frustrated by how complicated writing new actions (especially async ones) can be using redux. I don't think ending up with a chain of actions like ON_REQUEST_PLAY, ON_REQUEST_PLAY_SUCCESS, ON_REQUEST_PLAY_ERROR, and a saga or a thunk all spread across multiple files is anybody's idea of a good time. I've found that without redux my code is a lot simpler and easier to understand, while achieving the same level of relatively complex functionality.

Loading, optimistic-rendering and error states

A really neat feature of react-apollo is the way that it handles loading, error and "optimistic" UI. Consider the slightly more complex example below:

<Query query={GET_PLAYS}>
  {(data, loading, error) => {
    if (loading && !data) return <Spinner />
    if (error) return <Error message={error.message} />
    if (!data) return <NotFound />
    return data.getPlays.map(item => <Play {...item} loading={loading} />)

This particular implementation shows a loading spinner if the query is in-flight and there is no cached data. If there is locally cached data, this will be displayed while the query is running (we can still show a spinner in this case if we want to). If the request errors, this can be displayed as well, and all with only a few lines of code using the props passed down from the Query HOC.

We can also control how the local cache is used by specifying a fetchPolicy, for instance cache-and-network, no-cache and so on which tells react-apollo where to look for data. This makes it very easy to handle real world scenarios like displaying data quickly, and merging in new data from the server automagically when it arrives.

Its even neater for mutations, which offer an optimisticResponse option. Here you can pass the UI the value you think will be returned from a Mutation which is stored temporarily in the local cache and displayed in the UI. If the request errors out the UI is automatically rolled back to the unmodified state, but if the request is successful it appears to the user that the change has been made without any latency. (This feature alone solves about three hard to fix issues I had with updating the redux-firestore backend).

The GraphQL Playground

This is a fantastic tool for developing / testing / getting to know how GraphQL works.

What I don't like about GraphQL (and/or Prisma)

Despite all these features, GraphQL certainly isn't perfect. Here are some of the main issues I've come across:

Lots of boilerplate and repetition

On the server, there is a lot of boilerplate code. For prisma based applications, developers are encouraged to have a "database layer" and an "API layer". In the case of prisma this means you are required to maintain your database schema in three different places:

  1. The prisma schema file, which is used to create and migrate the database structure
  2. prisma client bindings, automatically generated from the schema file
  3. a separate (but in many places identical) schema for the graphql-yoga back end.

In addition to this, each possible query mutation requires a resolver to be written which handles these queries. The schema for the queries is then replicated client side (with a slightly different format).

While there are some tools to reduce the boilerplate, this is probably the worst "feature" of GraphQL. I've come across to date.

Error messages

On the server I've had some issues with error messages being a bit vague, although part of that issues could just be me getting to grips with how they are written.


A neat thing about firebase and firestore was how easy it was to set up and install a back end. It literally takes five seconds to do, and cost $0. I could also host the front end using firebase hosting and deploy it from a CLI.

The picture for GraphQL is a lot less pretty. There are products like graph.cool and hasura which can be deployed to heroku and a bunch of others that come up in searches but have since folded. Neither solution really works for me - Prisma cloud hosting starts at $300 USD a month; I don't understand this value proposition. There are several other options (i.e. some open source ones, Amazon AppSync etc), but there appears to be a lot of churn in the smaller providers.

The other option is to "roll your own" backend using docker and a VPS, which is basically the only option documented by Prisma. Unfortunately Docker is incompatible with the most common version of Win 10 so this isn't an option. To be honest part of the reason I initially chose firebase was that I'd rather spend time getting the front end to a state where I can share the app with others, as opposed to working on DevOps.

In the end I opted to use a free Prisma Cloud development server as an interim solution, however this appears to have a very long latency ~1s on requests. I hope that by the time I'm moving towards "production", some other viable options have emerged.

NOTE FROM AN OLDER AND WISER WILL I think at this stage I'm looking at using an AppSync / Cognito / DynamoDB / Lambda backend, but I may make another post later on if I go down that route.

ANOTHER NOTE FROM AN EVEN OLDER AND WISER WILL Hey, it turns out I can just wrap my firestore DB with a GraphQL endpoint!

A sneak preview of the new interface (size: 1300x599px)

Overall verdict

GraphQL has some annoyances but overall I've really enjoyed building a server and application with it. There are some frustrations compared to firebase but overall I'm happier developing with the GraphQL backend as it gives me an almost functional approach and few surprises.

The client also seems like a lot less of a hassle to work with than mixing redux and firestore and with the backend fleshed out I'm implementing features a lot faster than I was with firestore. Many of the issues I had trouble working around with firebase just aren't issues with the new design.

I'm really excited about building some of the new features I've been dreaming about for a few years and sharing the app with some other coaches!